L. Michael Hankes  |  ATTORNEY AT LAW
tel (617) 723-1144  |  fax (617) 723-0304

Developments In Contract Negotiations With Meineke

As all of you know from all the articles that have been written in recent months, representative Meineke Dealers and the MDA have been involved in contract negotiations with senior management at Meineke for nearly a year. As many of you also know, the current Meineke Franchise agreement was negotiated by a representative group of Meineke dealers in the 1999-2000 time period. Those negotiations took place following the reversal of the approximately $590 million judgment entered against Meineke and its then corporate parent…

Why All those Handicapped Ramps are So Important

When I lined up for the open­ing face off on August 24, 2008, the oppos­ing winger asked how the knee was doing. As I replied that it was a lot bet­ter than it had been when it wasn’t attached to my leg, I couldn’t help but reflect on the road I had trav­eled over the pre­vi­ous six months to make it back from an injury that should have left me barely able to walk…

The Importance of the Meineke Dealers Association to Your Franchised Business

Sev­eral years ago, I wrote an arti­cle about the impor­tance of the con­tract rights the Meineke Deal­ers Asso­ca­tion has under the Meineke Fran­chise and Trade­mark Agree­ment nego­ti­ated in 1999–2000. Mem­o­ries fade as events in time become more remote and doubt­less not every­one remem­bers that those con­tract nego­ti­a­tions were cham­pi­oned by 110 Meineke Deal­ers who per­son­ally sup­ported and funded that effort in the wake of the class action enti­tled Brous­sard et al. v. Meineke Dis­count Muf­fler Shops, Inc., et al., 155 F.3d 331(4th Cir. 1998).

Advertising: Edgy or Inappropriate?

In today’s world, as com­pa­nies com­pete to sell their prod­ucts in an increas­ingly com­pet­i­tive envi­ron­ment, adver­tis­ing, both in print and media, seeks to have impact. As adver­tis­ing strives to be “edgy”, there is often a fine line between devel­op­ing “edgy” ads that have impact and those which are inappropriate.

Brand Positioning

Much has been writ­ten about the con­cept of brand posi­tion­ing in the mod­ern mar­ket­place. This arti­cle is a gen­eral dis­cus­sion of some notions of the con­cept of “Brand Posi­tion­ing” and is not intended to be an author­i­ta­tive dis­cus­sion of the subject.

Being Prepared for Elder Care

This is not the typ­i­cal arti­cle that I write as an attor­ney, but if any of you who read it are able to effec­tively plan for the events that we faced, then it was a mes­sage worth imparting.

Dealing with Encroachment Issues in the Real World

This arti­cle describes the res­o­lu­tion of an actual encroach­ment dis­pute with­out resort to lit­i­ga­tion. It is the sec­ond part of a two part article.

The Impact of Contract Interpretation on Encroachment Issues

In this arti­cle the impact of con­tract inter­pre­ta­tion on the fran­chise rights of the deal­ers in the Meineke sys­tem is dis­cussed. This arti­cle is the first of two parts.

The Importance of Dealer Participation in the Meineke Franchise System

This arti­cle high­lights the promises in the Meineke fran­chise con­tract afford­ing Meineke deal­ers the oppor­tu­nity to have an active say in the admin­is­tra­tion of their fran­chise system.

Dealers Association Retains Legal Counsel

This arti­cle describes changes to the Meineke fran­chise con­tract made since the new agree­ment was rolled out to the Meineke deal­er­ship in 2000.

Franchisee Obtains Concessions from Days Inns

In a case that set­tled dur­ing trial in the United States Dis­trict Court in Arkansas, the fran­chisee was able to obtain sig­nif­i­cant con­ces­sions from Days Inns to com­pen­sate it for the dam­age done by encroach­ment from a new Days Inn fran­chise, which were out­lined in the Con­sent Order. The dam­ages caused to Lod­ing Devel­op­ment could eas­ily have been avoided, had Days Inns been more care­ful in the imple­men­ta­tion of its expan­sion program.